Should businesses abandon traditional CRM systems when AI customer service tools can predict client needs before they arise?
Janet knows where the bodies are buried.
She remembers that the procurement director at your biggest client hates PowerPoint. She knows that your second-largest client always pays late, but compensates with end-of-quarter bulk buys. Janet is the human CRM, the whisperer of client quirks, the keeper of crucial knowledge that never got logged anywhere.
And when she leaves?
Good luck. You’ll find yourself staring at a half-updated Salesforce record and a cryptic note from 2021: “Follow up late Q3 re: partnership shift?”.
Useful.
We’ve all built organizations that quietly reward people like Janet for hoarding knowledge—then act surprised when their departure leaves a smoking crater in our operations. It’s not just annoying. It's a structural failure in how we manage customer data, relationships, and responsibility.
And while AI tools are starting to predict customer needs with uncanny precision, there's a dangerous myth taking root in boardrooms: that we can ditch our clunky CRMs entirely and let AI take the wheel.
That’s not innovation. That’s corporate amnesia in a cool interface.
The Glorified Rolodex Problem
Let’s not pretend CRMs have done themselves any favors.
Most are still painful to use. Just say “Salesforce” in a crowded room of account managers and watch their eyes glaze over. It’s a love-hate relationship, mostly skewing toward hate.
Why? Because we treated CRM systems like glorified contact lists.
We made them the graveyard of meeting notes and “next steps TBD” entries. We never included the metadata that actually made a relationship real: who got ghosted, which promises where made under duress, and that time we saved a deal over drinks at an industry event.
And now AI shows up, promising to predict customer churn, personalize outreach, and whisper the next “right move” into our reps’ ears like an overzealous Clippy.
Understandably, people ask: why bother keeping the bloated CRM around?
The better question is: what do we lose if we don’t?
CRMs Are Memory. AI Is Pattern Recognition.
Prediction is powerful. But it’s not history.
AI can say, “This customer is 87% likely to cancel next quarter.” But it doesn’t know that last time they were 87% likely to cancel, we salvaged the deal through a concession that involved a three-month roadmap change and a legal workaround.
That information? Isn’t in your AI, unless it lived in your CRM. Or somebody noted it. Somewhere.
AI thrives on structured data. Where did the data structure come from? CRMs. Deals, complaints, call logs, renewal cycles, emails tagged to specific user IDs. If your CRM is a sloppy mess, your AI is making decisions based on Swiss cheese.
In fact, CRMs weren’t broken. The way we used them was.
We treated notes as optional. We let star players bypass the system so they could “move faster.” We failed to embed CRM use into the daily rhythm of work — and so it became a chore instead of a spine.
No wonder people want to rip it out and start fresh.
The “Janet Problem” Is a Cultural Problem
Let’s go back to Janet.
Her existence is symptomatic of something deeper: we’ve rewarded people for guarding information, not sharing it.
In many organizations, knowledge hoarding is the last bastion of job security. If you're the only one who knows how to fix something, you're safe. If you bother to document and train others? You’ve just made yourself replaceable.
That dynamic doesn’t go away with AI. In fact, it can get worse.
Because once you throw predictive engines on top of your customer data, your people stop asking where the insights come from. They start trusting the AI like it’s omniscient. And God help you when it misfires — because Janet isn’t around to overrule it.
We need to stop pretending this is a tooling issue. It’s a leadership and incentive design issue.
Companies love rolling out new knowledge management platforms. It's cultural change they avoid.
Do you measure and recognize knowledge sharing? Do you reward reps for documenting edge cases? Do you bonus the manager who trains three backups instead of hoarding secrets?
If not, your AI assistant will merely sit on top of the very same human bottlenecks we've failed to fix.
Don’t Kill the CRM — Weaponize It
There’s a seductive narrative in tech right now: out with the old, in with the predictive.
It makes for bold headlines and suspicious product roadmaps. But in the real world — especially in B2B, complex sales cycles, and industries where relationships span years — you’ll need both the memory and the mind.
- AI is your sixth sense. CRM is your muscle memory.
- AI flags what's likely. CRM explains why.
- AI can predict behavior. CRM sustains relationships.
The best companies aren’t choosing between CRM and AI. They’re blending them so seamlessly the difference disappears.
Consider HubSpot’s AI-powered email assistant, which scans CRM records and suggests follow-ups based on previous interactions. Or how Salesforce Einstein can analyze CRM activity and recommend leads most likely to convert — but only if your data hygiene doesn’t look like a Jackson Pollock painting.
When implemented well, AI-enhanced CRMs can:
- Auto-surface dormant leads that were lost in a sea of notes
- Highlight friction points in the sales cycle based on prior interactions
- Update contact records using email trails or meeting transcriptions
- Alert reps to regional compliance issues before sending a proposal
All of this, contingent on a basic truth: The CRM has to be fed.
And right now, most aren't. They're starved junkyards of incomplete documentation, tribal knowledge workarounds, and a culture that treats filing notes like after-school detention.
If You Ditch the CRM, Be Ready to Fly Blind
But what if you ditch it anyway?
What happens when your customer-facing team starts relying solely on AI predictions without structured memory?
Let me paint you a picture.
An AI assistant notices a client hasn’t logged into your portal in 23 days. It flags them as a churn risk and recommends a retention email: “We miss you! Let’s talk.”
What the AI doesn’t know? Two weeks ago, your head of customer success had an off-the-record call where the client said they were re-architecting their business. They’ll be quiet for a month but plan to double their spend next quarter.
Where was that call noted? In the CRM? Nope. It was a side Slack message. Maybe a sticky note. Maybe nowhere.
So now your AI triggers an outreach that feels tone-deaf — and suddenly your double-down opportunity becomes a trust crater.
The worst part? Everyone thinks the AI “knows.”
Do that a few times, and you erode more than just revenue. You erode credibility — both human and automated.
How Smart Companies Are Solving This
The smartest companies aren’t tearing out CRMs. They’re fixing their information culture so CRMs and AI can work together.
-
Gitlab operates from a “handbook-first” principle. They over-document. Over-expose. Over-share. Not because it's sexy, but because they want continuity between people, tools, and time zones.
-
Some firms tie performance metrics to how well knowledge is documented and refreshed. One company even adjusted bonuses based on how many teammates could take over your role without a fire drill.
-
Others are integrating CRMs and AI in layered stacks: using AI not as an oracle, but as a context-sensitive assistant. Summarizing, flagging, prompting — not replacing.
They don’t see AI as a crystal ball. They see it as an amplifier. Of what’s already there. Or not.
Okay, So What Do You Do?
Here’s the reality check:
- If your CRM sucks, AI will amplify that suck.
- If your culture rewards knowledge hoarding, your systems will reflect that — no matter how advanced they look.
- If you confuse prediction with understanding, you’ll lose customers you didn’t even know were wavering.
But if you treat your CRM like living infrastructure — with AI as the nerve system connecting and interpreting it — you’ve got a shot at building something remarkable: a scalable memory machine that doesn’t forget the human parts.
So don’t kill the CRM.
Teach it to remember better.
And while you’re at it?
Find your Janets. Talk to them. Reward them for teaching instead of guarding. Not just because it’s efficient — but because it’s the only way your organization survives the next wave of change.
Want to make your AI smarter?
Start by making your culture less afraid to share.
This article was sparked by an AI debate. Read the original conversation here

Lumman
AI Solutions & Ops